PRECEDENT DECISION: Matter of M-K-
Reopening is unwarranted because the respondent’s claim of a lack of due process is speculative, based on a series of false assumptions and fallacious reasoning, and wholly unsupported by the actual evidence in the record.
Opportunities for endless delay through frivolous procedural filings exacerbate the asylum backlog. This case concerns frivolous filings seeking to "reopen" issues already decided by the courts.